Government in Exile

Are Liberals anti-Christian?

"Ernie" has some thoughts on liberals and Christians.

 It's pretty obvious that Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism and other long standing religions have been targeted by the left for elimination.  We're all familiar with the seeming endless list of anti-Christian organizations that continuously go to court to "shut down" religious activities.  We can't mention Jesus, Christ, Moses or any other Biblical personalities in school, the workplace, the public square, the Pledge of Allegiance, or any other place that has heretofore been not only acceptable, but expected and applauded.  While this assault on Christianity continues to expand we're ridiculed, insulted, abased and called bigots if we say anything against Islam or the Koran. 

Being politically correct apparently applies only when referring to Muslims.  "Most Muslims are pro-American and moderate, caring people", we're told by the left.  Sorry, but when Muslims say nothing in rebuttal to 9/11, when they sing and dance in the streets at the news, when these loving moderates didn't flee from Islam in response to Islamic terrorism that continues to murder innocent people by the thousands around the world, you can forget trying to convince me that there are "moderate" Muslims.  They all adhere to the tenets of the Koran which includes the order to convert infidels or kill them.

 

     Back to the demise of Christianity.  We're being replaced by a new religion called "liberalism".   Even Obama tells the world that we're not a Christian nation anymore.  It's not hard to realize why the left hates Christianity and wants it forever destroyed.  Our beliefs simply run counter to the beliefs of the Religion of Liberalism.  For example:

 

     a.  Christians are against abortion.  The left promotes it and finances it.

     b.  Christians believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.   The left is in favor of same-sex marriage.

     c.  Christians believe in the constitution.  The left claims it's an evolving document that no longer fits with the "new norm" crowd.

     d.  Jesus taught against slothfulness (laziness for you low-information voters).  The left wants more and more people dependent upon government for their survival.

     e.  Christians believe its a parent's right to discipline their children.  The left thinks kids should be allowed to do whatever they want and parents who discipline them should be arrested for child abuse.

     f.   Christians believe in the Ten Commandments.  There might be 1 or 2 the left will accept, but that's about it.  What's all this baloney about no adultery, stealing, bearing false witness and all those other invasions of human rights?

     g.  Christians teach against excessive drinking.   The left wants to legalize all drugs.

     h.  Jesus said, "have no other Gods before me."  The left has more gods than the Romans had.  For example money, iphones, luxury cars, drugs/booze, the democrat party, Obama, Hollywood, global warming, socialism, the environment,  and on and on.

     I.   Christians teach abstinence to their children.  The left wants them to have a right to abortions, the morning-after pill, and other contraceptives...and paid for by the taxpayer.

 

     In fact you can read through the Bible and especially the teachings of the Gospels and you'll find very few things the left would agree with.  In fact, you'll find more and more members of the Church of Liberalism who reject the Bible as myth, folk lore or terribly out of date in today's "new norm".   Ronald Reagan said, "when we take God out of country, then we'll have no country."

Is American Culture Dying?

"Ernie" has some thoughts of the demise of American culture.

Obama made it very clear in his 2008 campaign that he was going to fundamentally transform America.  He didn't say how, or what he was going to transform it to, but after 5 years of this disastrous administration we have a pretty clear idea. 

 

     As much as he'd like to take full responsibility for what's befallen us as a country and a people, this ideology really started long before his regime took office.  You can go all he way back to that Woodrow Wilson, the nation's first "progressive" statists who preached the growth and power of the government.  But wait, let's not forget Teddy Roosevelt.  For all his admirable qualities, he was the first conservationist president who took millions of acres out of the private sector and gave it to the government to "preserve the natural environment".  

 

     Back to the "how" part of the transformation, that too was designed and implemented back in the FDR days.  It began with the work projects designed to defeat the Great Depression.  What it really did was transfer personal responsibility to various government welfare programs.  Though the media gave him full credit for ending the depression, it was the second world war that put America back on a path for economic growth, primarily by creating a massive industrial revolution.  

 

     It was FDR's charisma that began transforming the media from journalism to the propaganda wing of the democrat party.  That situation has grown out of control and probably irreversible.  In addition the "progressives" gained control of the educational system and eventually the entertainment industry.  The influence of these 3 entities to implement Obama's ideology is insurmountable.

 

     Most recently beginning with Clinton and exploding under the Obama regime, the fuel that runs the "transformation" engine is in these new phrases....Political Correctness (PC) and diversity.  As with integration, affirmative action, Head Start, quotas and numerous other welfare programs, the lower classes (primarily blacks) were going to be freed from their slavery mentality and lifted up to become part of the great American culture.  Such things as learning about personal responsibility, love for country, work ethic, career opportunities, unity with other ethic groups, Christian values, etc.  You know, the culture that made Americans proud and productive for 150 years.  Has it worked?  Absolutely not.  School integration didn't lift the black culture up, it brought their inner city culture into public schools and helped destroy the best educational system in the world.  But we cater to this backsliding into the abyss in the name of diversity and PC.  As a result the number of blacks feeding at the government trough has skyrocketed, new welfare programs keep on coming, and America is on the verge of bankruptcy.

 

    But this destruction of the proud American culture doesn't stop there.  Look at the worlds of music and sports.  Music is nothing more than drug enhanced screaming, and sports arenas have become the Roman coliseums of the new century.  Sportsmanship has been replaced with endzone dances, chest pounding, trash talking, tattoos, body piercing, in-your-face boasting, and other inner city inventions. 

 

     Add to this the influx of hispanics flooding across the border.  Again in the names of PC and diversity, we have to let them bring their cultures with them, and sacrifice our American culture and traditions to accommodate theirs.  Heaven help us as the Islamic influence continues to grow and begins crowding out Christianity, Judaism and American traditions.  Come to think of it, it's already happening.  Are you ready for Shariah law?  You wouldn't want to offend the people who are trying to destroy us, now would you?

 

    Abandoning the tradition of the proud American culturalism that built this country into the worlds most powerful, wealthiest, freest, most compassionate (internationally & domestically) and innovative nation in the history of mankind, we are dooming the country to failure.  Just like Greece, Spain, Italy, and most of the other Euro Zone, only worse.  When the giant falls, the noise is much louder, the destruction more devastating.   

 

     Would the last person left alive please turn out the lights?     

Is Political Correctness Destroying America?

"Ernie" has some thoughts on political correctness. 

I enjoyed reading Peter's article because it touched on a topic I wanted to write about....political correctness and how it's destroying our freedoms from top to bottom.  Whether its practicing our freedom of religion, our right to disagree, our freedom of speech or any/all of the other freedoms we've come to take for granted in a free society, they're being taken from us.  In simple terms we're losing the freedom to make our own life choices, or to just be ourselves.  Check out Common Core.  This travesty will take our career choices and our education choices away from the family and giving them to the government.  It would eliminate the right to home school our children.  Just another liberal program designed to "transform" America.

 

Many people think PC began under the Clinton administration, but actually it's been alive and well for thousands of years.  Everywhere there was an authoritarian style government, people were not allowed to voice an opinion or do anything that wasn't approved by the government.  Joseph Stalin was the most recent autocrat who demanded that people buy the government ideology or face punishment ranging from death to living forever in a Siberian gulag.

 

A noted authority on terrorism was asked by FOX yesterday what we need to do to protect ourselves from being destroyed by Muslim extremists.  His answer...."do away with political correctness".   How can we justify kissing the feet of people who want to wipe us off the face of the earth?  PC says because we want to show them that we're tolerant and respect their beliefs.  Okay, we've shown them so can we now shut down all the mosques in America, denounce Islam as an unrecognized religion, and quit sending them trillions of dollars for  their oil when we have more oil underground than they have?   An imam can rail against America, Jews, Christians, capitalism, American "luxuries", etc, and that's fine.  But just let a Methodist preacher read (from the Bible) something negative about same sex marriage, homosexuality or abortion, and the progressives want to shut him down, close his church and turn the ACLU loose on him.

 

I saw recently where a teacher was fired for giving a student a Bible.  It seems the student was constantly asking the teacher (outside the classroom) about various verses in the Bible.  When he asked the teacher if he could get him a Bible, the teacher took his own small Bible from his pocket and gave it to him.  He specifically told the student that it was a personal gift and had nothing to with school.  When the principal found out about it, he fired the teacher.  This is just one more example of PC gone crazy.  He could have given him a copy of the Koran and nothing would have been said.

 

There is an endless string of such examples of how PC is destroying our lives, and our country.  Over time I've even grown proud of some of the spiteful, insulting labels they hang on people like me.  Anything that shows I'm not "one of them" is OK fine with me.

Is the Justice Department Pro-Abortion?

The House Judiciary Committee today held a hearing on “Mismanagement at the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice” and invited Liberty Counsel’s Senior Litigation Counsel, Harry Mihet, to testify on this troubling subject. Mihet was the lead attorney in Liberty Counsel’s successful defense of Susan Pine, a pro-life woman who endured a two-year, baseless and politically motivated prosecution by the DOJ, under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez. Mr. Perez is President Obama’s nominee for Secretary of Labor. Mihet today told Congress that “The Department of Justice has apparently forgotten its name and that its purpose is to pursue justice and protect civil rights, not unconstitutional, groundless claims manufactured by abortion clinics to intimidate and silence pro-life Americans.” Mihet recounted how Mr. Perez assembled a team of seven (7) taxpayer-funded lawyers, flew many of them down to Florida for a taxpayer-funded stakeout of Ms. Pine’s constitutionally protected speech outside an abortion clinic, and filed a federal lawsuit against her, claiming that she “obstructed” a vehicle from entering the clinic. The DOJ had no “victim” because no one ever complained of being obstructed. The DOJ and the clinic failed to preserve the videotapes from the clinic’s security system, which would have shown that Ms. Pine broke no law. And the DOJ manufactured facts out of whole cloth, only to have them refuted by its own witnesses. At the end of the two-year ordeal, federal Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp concluded that “the evidence could not lead a rational jury to find that Ms. Pine’s conduct [i.e., having peaceful conversations with clinic visitors on a public sidewalk] constituted a physical obstruction” in violation of any law. “The Court is at a loss as to why the Government chose to prosecute this particular case in the first place,” he added. And he suspected that “this action was the product of a concerted effort between the Government and the [abortion clinic], which began well before the date of the incident at issue, to quell Ms. Pine’s activities.” The Court threw out the DOJ’s lawsuit, and the DOJ paid $120,000 in fees and costs for its frivolous conduct. “When the very institution charged with protecting civil rights becomes complicit in violating them, all Americans suffer,” said Mihet. “Mr. Perez and those under his leadership have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted to follow the rule of law when it conflicts with their partisan ideology,” he added. Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, commented: “Today’s testimony reveals that this Department of Justice is driven by political ideology rather than the rule of law. The testimony is especially troubling regarding Thomas Perez. When confronted with the thugs of the New Black Panther Party, who used clubs to intimidate citizens from voting, he refused to apply the law because he believes the law protecting the right to vote free of intimidation does not apply to ‘white citizens.’ In our case with Susan Pine, Perez ignored the law and placed his abortion ideology over the rule of law. He was soundly chastised by the federal judge for his shocking disregard for the law and facts. He has been nominated by President Obama to be the Secretary of Labor. In this capacity, he would be charged with equal enforcement of employment non-discrimination laws, which past history reveals he is incapable of doing."

Are Physicians Turning Away Patients Because of ObamaCare?

"Ernie" has some thoughts on ObamaCare.

An article by the Washington Post today reported that many cancer physicians were turning away Medicare patients because of the sequestration cuts.  Naturally the Post..being a propoganda rag for the WH... slanted the article by claiming the cuts were due to the republicans refusing to negotiate with lib/dems to stop the sequester from going into effect.  The subtle accusation being that republicans would rather let our seniors die than "reach across the aisle" to negotiate with the all-caring, all-compassionate libs who just want to save the lives of our precious senior citizens.  The truth appears to be that libs would rather let our seniors die than stop ObamaCare from robbing the Medicare system.  After all, most of the elderly vote republican.

  

It's obvious the far left is going to blame the sequester and the republicans for all economic suffering in the country from ending WH tours to reducing the number of border patrol agents on our Mexican border.  I guess if N.Korea throws a missle at us it will be the fault of the GOP's sequestration.   Their comrades in the media will be only too willing to "spread the word".

The Post article failed to mention that ObamaCare robbed $716B from Medicare in order to fund ObamaCare.  That $716B is a whole lot bigger number than the 2% budget cuts that "could" be assessed by the sequester against MediCare.  Please note that the sequester says the cuts "could be"...not "would be"...cut.  That insinuates that the cuts are not mandatory.  They further failed to mention that the 2% cuts were not cuts from the Medicare budget, but rather cuts from the projected 6% rate of growth of the budget.  It didn't mention anything about the WH budget for 2013 already 2 months late, with no anticipated submission date in sight.  But what the heck, he hasn't submitted and passed a budget in 5 years.  How you supposed to do that and campaign at the same time?  Not to mention those golf outings and luxury vacations that have to be fit into his schedule.

It's obvious that truthfulness has taken a leave of absence from the Obama administration and the media.  The media is not as guilty of blatant lying as Obama, but rather lean more towards the side of "lying by omission".  In other words, don't print or broadcast anything that would hinder Obama's ideological agenda of destroying America as planned and taught by Cloward and Piven at Columbia U.  (Obama was one of their most attentive students).  They outlined a plan for destroying our economy by overloading the entitlement system via welfare, nationalized health care, strangling the private sector, and other assorted gov't expenditures.   If  the media feels forced to at least mention such WH indiscretions you'll find them on page 46 or in a once only 30-second clip on the news.  Forget MSNBC reporting any such thing, Matthews is still giddy over the tingling in his leg.

Is the Republican Party Dying?

"Ernie" has some thoughts on the Republican party.

 Accounts of the pending death of the Republican party may not be far from wrong.  It must be comforting to libs knowing all they have to do is stand by and watch as the GOP goes about destroying itself...and without any help from them.

     Rand Paul took a stand regarding Brennan and the use of drones inside the US with a 9-hour filibuster.  It was courageous and necessary, especially after the appointments of Kerry and Hagel.   ( A known liar and a closet anti-semite).  Ironically, the dems didn't have much to say about Paul's action, seeming content to let the progressive republican RINOs attempt to discredit and even destroy him politically.  The first to jump on him was McCain, a 2-time loser for the White House, and someone whose usefulness to the conservative movement is zilch.  When Paul responded, McCain jumped on him again claiming Paul was going against the GOP and trying to appeal to young pro-liberalism college students in their dorms.  These are the same critics who complain that the GOP has lost the youth vote.  Which is it, John?  Is appealing to college students good or bad?

     The next notable critic was Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard.  His comments must have made Bill Buckley and Ronald Reagan turn over in their graves.  Anyway, thanks Bill and John for giving the dems plenty of soundbytes to use in the 2014 election.  You may not realize it yet, but Obama's going to come out all guns blazing the win back the House.  God forbid that he and his Marxist pals ever get control of the House, the Senate, the Judiciary and the executive branches. Can you imagine?  Who would be left to stop him from totally destroying the constitution, the economy, the conservatives, the military, and most likely the 22nd amendment?  Please don't tell me our saviors will be McConnell, Boehner, Kristol, McCain and the rest of the progressive republicans.  Or as I like to refer to them...the doormat wing of the Democrat party.

 

     Just because the GOP is devouring itself, don't think that the dems will just fall over laughing and not do anything to help out.  The trashing of Paul, Lee, Cruz and all other TEA Party types is just beginning.  When the libs are so good at destroying their political enemies, can you possibly believe they won't get Hollywood, the state run media and the Oprah Winfrey types geared up for an onslaught against GOP opponents in 2014?  They were all too busy singing the praises of that great statesman, humanitarian multibillionaire, Hugo Chavez. 

 

     Let us not forget, in this next election the prize is the House, not the White House.  The few conservatives left breathing need to stand up and be counted.  The future of the country is at stake.

Is it too Late to Get Rid of ObamaCare?

By Matt Barber   “But Republican governors are folding like cheap lawn chairs,” you might say. “And political eunuchs in the GOP establishment are bowing to Obama like he bows to foreign dictators. Any hope of repeal is long dead, and besides, Chief Justice John Roberts put the final nail in the judicial coffin last summer, didn’t he? Any chance of killing the Obamacare zombie is gone, right?” Wrong. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media paid it little attention, but back in November the U.S. Supreme Court shocked many in the legal community by granting Liberty Counsel’s motion for a rehearing on its multi-pronged challenge to Obamacare. The high court ordered the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear arguments. This is extremely rare and means, almost certainly, that Chief Justice Roberts will get another bite at the rotten apple – this time, with a whole new quiver of legal arrows. Following the Supreme Court’s directive, Liberty Counsel recently filed its brief in the case of Liberty University v. Geithner. The Christian civil rights firm represents Liberty University and two private individuals in this case. While there are other legal challenges to the employer contraceptive/abortifacient mandate, Liberty Counsel’s is the most comprehensive case pending in the country. The lawsuit challenges 1) the employer mandate for all employers; 2) the abortion mandate for religious employers; 3) the abortion mandate for individuals; and 4) the entire law because tax bills must originate in the House and Obamacare originated in the Senate. This case is the only one in the country that challenges the entire employer mandate for all employers. Like other pending cases, Liberty Counsel’s also challenges the so-called “Preventative coverage” mandate, which requires employers to provide free contraceptives, sterilization, abortion-inducing drugs and IUDs, of which the latter two cause abortion. Additionally, Obamacare compels individual citizens to violate their conscience by making them directly fund abortion homicide – both surgical and chemical – under penalty of law. It forces all employees who are part of a plan that offers abortion coverage to pay $1 per month directly to a “free” abortion fund. There is no opt-out provision, and information relative to which plans offer abortion is intentionally covered-up. This too is part of the case, so don’t let anyone tell you that Obamacare doesn’t require you to fund abortion on demand. If they do, they’re simply lying through their triple-grande-four-pump-hazelnut-mocha-stained teeth. Finally, Liberty Counsel’s brief argues that Obamacare is invalid because, since it’s a tax – as the Supreme Court already ruled in June – it violates the Constitution’s Origination Clause. To pass constitutional muster, tax bills must originate in the House, not the Senate. Before the Democrat-led Senate rammed it through in the dead of night, Christmas Eve 2009 – Senate President Harry Reid used a House bill unrelated to Obamacare, struck all the language and the title so that only the former HR number remained, and then inserted a new title and over 2,000 pages of job-killing, economy-crushing, health-care-rationing compost. Sneaky? Yes. Typical? No doubt. Unconstitutional? Absolutely. It’s like dropping a Ford Pinto engine into a totaled Ferrari body, patching it up and then selling it to some unsuspecting dupe as a “brand new Ferrari.” Unfortunately, America was that unsuspecting dupe. Well, the jig’s up. The Constitution is unambiguous on this matter: “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.” Const. art. I §7, cl. 1. As Liberty Counsel’s brief notes, “Though denominated with a House bill number, the Act actually originated in the Senate, and therefore violates the Origination Clause.” “Obamacare represents a frontal attack to religious freedom,” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “Obamacare is a train about to collide with the fundamental right to free exercise of religion. Not only does Obamacare violate the rights of religious employers because of its abortion mandate, it violates the rights of individuals who oppose abortion and the rights of all employers, religious or not. “And to boot,” continued Staver, “the entire law is invalid because tax bills must originate in the House, and Obamacare originated in the Senate.” Yep, doctor shortages, medical-school dropouts, skyrocketing premiums, no money for pre-existing conditions, trillions more than promised, forced taxpayer funding of abortion, critical health-care rationing and a bankrupt nation. Welcome to America’s fall. Welcome to Obamacare. Zombies eat brains. If they weren’t already dead, they’d most certainly starve to death on the squalid diet of grey matter served-up by Obama, Reid, Pelosi and every other cracked skull who voted to open the curtain on this unconstitutional Obamacare freak show. Thankfully, Chief Justice Roberts, whom I strongly suspect regrets voting to uphold it, looks to have another chance to bury it once and for all. Wonder if that was his strategy all along. I sure hope so.

Bloody Hands: The Southern Poverty Law Center

By Matt Barber   Long before homosexual activist Floyd Corkins entered the D.C.-based Family Research Council (FRC) with the intent to commit mass murder, I warned from the rooftops that the hard-left Southern Poverty Law Center’s anti-Christian “hate group” propaganda might spur such bloodshed. With a column headlined,“Liberal violence rising,” I wrote, “The SPLC’s dangerous and irresponsible (‘hate group’) disinformation campaign can embolden and give license to like-minded, though less stable, left-wing extremists, creating a climate of true hate. Such a climate is ripe for violence.” Tragically, my deepest fears were realized. Then, in August, days after Corkins was heroically disarmed by FRC employ Leo Johnson, whom Corkins shot in the arm, I penned another column titled “Fanning the flames of left-wing violence.” I plead with the SPLC to end its “dishonest and reprehensible” strategy of “juxtaposing FRC and other Christian organizations with violent extremist groups” in a transparent effort to marginalize them. “I appeal to your sense of goodwill. This is not a game. Lives are at stake,” I implored. “I know you have good employees (I’ve met some) who believe they’re doing the right thing; so, please, validate that belief. It’s time to remove your metaphorical ‘hate group’ Star of David from mainstream Christian organizations before another of your ideological allies spills blood.” I no longer believe the SPLC has a sense of goodwill. In fact, based on FBI evidence and the group’s own actions (and inaction), I and many others are left with no other inference but this: The SPLC – a left-wing extremist fundraising behemoth – may be intentionally inciting anti-Christian violence. Just days ago, Corkins pled guilty to a number of charges, including domestic terrorism. FBI evidence revealed that he was both motivated by and utilized the SPLC’s “anti-gay hate map” to target and locate his intended Christian mass murder victims. Further evidence reveals that the “hate map” – more accurately labeled “hit map” – even provided the exact location of FRC and other Christian groups found on Corkins’ hit-list with little red dots to helpfully pinpoint their precise locations. Corkins told the FBI after the shooting that he intended to “kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-fil-A sandwiches (which he brought with him) in victims’ faces.” Prosecutors said that he planned to leave FRC after the attack and go to another conservative group to continue his reign of terror. A handwritten list of three other groups was found with his belongings while an investigation of Corkins’ computer revealed that he identified his targets on the SPLC website. The other groups were also maliciously listed by the SPLC as “hate groups.” Motive to kill? Fomented. Who to kill? Provided. Where to kill? Pinpointed, with easy access to driving directions. The only thing the SPLC did not do was purchase Corkins’ gun and drive him to the crime scene. Here’s why, to my own aghast bewilderment, I’m left with little choice but to believe the SPLC may be intentionally inciting anti-Christian violence. As noted by the FRC, “Even after an attempted mass murder of the FRC staff, the ‘hate map’ is still prominently featured on the SPLC website today – which shocks most conservative pundits.” “Shocks” is an understatement. “When Congresswoman Giffords and several others were shot in Arizona by Jared Loughner, the left went into overdrive blaming Sarah Palin for a map that had a list of political targets on it. After the fact, we learned that Loughner was apolitical and he clearly had not used Sarah Palin’s map of political targets. That did not stop the left from blaming the right,” noted RedState’s Erick Erickson. “By the way, Palin took down her target map after the controversy. The Southern Poverty Law Center? Crickets …” What other explanation is there? I understand that it’s difficult to admit you’re wrong, especially when the scheme seemed so delicious at the time. But once FBI evidence conclusively proves that you were, to a large degree, responsible for inciting an act of domestic terrorism, most reasonable people would take a deep breath, take a step back, admit fault and hobble forward in an effort to rehabilitate a reputation in ruin. Is the SPLC a left-wing extremist group? Absolutely. Are they anti-Christian? Without a doubt. But few would have believed, until now, that they might intentionally, with malice aforethought, seek to incite anti-Christian bloodshed. Scandalously, the Obama administration continues to maintain deep ties with this radical organization. “The Southern Poverty Law Center has a long history of maliciously slandering pro-family groups with language and labels that incite hatred and undermine civil discourse,” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “In the issues of family and marriage, Christians are literally in the crosshairs of radical homosexual activists, and the SPLC is fueling the hatred and providing the targets. The SPLC should be held accountable for its reckless acts. Even more disturbing than the SPLC’s irresponsible behavior is the fact that the Obama administration is in bed with this group,” said Staver. “It is ironic that Christians who believe in natural marriage have been isolated by radical homosexual activists and demonized as ‘homophobes’ and ‘haters,’” he concluded. Weeks before Corkins pleaded guilty of terrorism and assault with intent to kill, a study from the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point entitled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far Right” said the “violent far right” exhibits an intense fear or dislike of foreign people, “including people with alternative sexual preferences.” The SPLC’s warped view of reality has been adopted by the Obama administration. “What the SPLC and other homosexual activists are doing is intentional and dangerous,” said Staver. “It is time to end the dangerous rhetoric and resume a civil discourse on the subject of natural marriage and morality.” Indeed if, God forbid, this SPLC “hate group” propaganda leads to another act of left-wing terrorism like that at FRC, this dangerous group should be held legally – perhaps even criminally liable. In the meantime, to the media, I say this: If you dare, even for a moment, give any credence whatsoever to this deadly SPLC “hate group” nonsense, you too will have blood on your hands. SPLC, you’re no longer fooling anyone. Stop fooling yourselves.

The Growing Apathy Among Supporters of the GOP

"Ernie" has some thoughts on the growing apathy among the GOP.

    Like many of you my enthusiasm for the GOP has dwindled significantly.  In previous articles I've referred to them as the doormat wing of the democrat party, and I haven't seen any reason in the past few months to change my opinion.  Emotionally, I continually go from "fight-fight-fight to "who cares?"   I look around for new leaders to inspire republicans, but other than Rubio and Rand Paul, the pickens are pretty slim.  I've heard them both interviewed recently by the likes of Hannity, Limbaugh and Levin, and they both look and sound like the only ones capable of leading us out of the abyss.  But as what?  Libertarians, republicans TEA Party or something entirely new?   Personally I think the GOP is on life support.  And I didn't quit them, they quit me.  Since the media, liberals and Hollywood have totally demonized the TEA Party, I had the brilliant idea of changing the name from the TEA Party to the Heritage Party and naming Jim DeMint as the head of it.  But not all is well and good with former TEA Party supporters.   I have a friend who is blaming the GOP demise on the TEA Party for putting up a few "loser" candidates and subsequently losing those elections.  Well, all I've got to say to that is the core of the conservative movement is in the House, Senate and numerous governor's offices, and by virtue of the TEA Party. 

 

     Saving the liberties and freedoms we've always known is a monumental task, and very possibly an impossible one.  This president  who's insulting the tradition of the oval office is leading us down a fast track to economic ruin.  In the process he's destroying the free enterprise system, individual initiative and responsibility, the constitution and Christianity.  That's quite an agenda he's got laid out in front of him, but I'm convinced he's capable of achieving his goals.  On top of that I heard where the whites will be the minority race in just 20-25 years.  Jesse Shake-down Jackson and Al Charlatan proudly claim that when that happens there'll be no more white presidents nor whites dominating the House and Senate.  Couple that bit of good news with Emir Obama getting a 3rd term (and he will if he can gain control of the House in 2014) and that will for sure be the end of the constitution and all the freedoms and liberties that came with it.   I sadly predict that the United States will find itself in the same situation as the east bloc of Europe following WW2.  The country will be broke and only a few workers will fill vital jobs (at starvation wages) while everyone else will be left to live in filth, chaos and poverty.  That will open the door for foreign governments to swoop in, take control of all private business and take over control of the country.  Just like the Soviet Union did in Poland, Hungary and the rest of the east bloc.

 

     Now the question is at my age should I really care?  After all, the younger generation doesn't care about anything but having the latest version of a smart phone, legalized marijuana, and free contraceptives.  They have no idea what real freedom and liberty is...or was, and they don't really care.  Today is their "new norm".   But I care.  And not just for me but for my grandchildren, that's why I continue to fight the battle and send my little column to our blog site. 

Reevaluating America

There is so much political information circulating on the Internet, some true, some not.  This email by and unknown author should make all step back and take stock of this country and our attitudes. 1)   Only in America could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes – be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all. 2)  Only in America could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population is black 3)  Only in America could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes. 4)  Only in America can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash. 5)  Only in America would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens. 6)  Only in America could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists." 7)  Only in America could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote. 8)  Only in America could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company(Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes(Nike). 9)  Only in America could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money. 10)  Only in America could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event. 11)  Only in America can a man with no background, no qualifications and no experience ... and a complete failure at his job ... be reelected.