Government in Exile

Women in Combat: Felony Stupid

By Matt Barber   The term “moronic” is defined as “notably stupid or lacking in good judgment.” It is frequently used as an insult. The Obama administration is moronic. This is not an insult. President Obama’s latest “notably stupid” stoke of America’s calculated slow burn is the decision to lift the ban on women in direct combat. Along with the move a few years back to turn the Officers’ Club into the Blue Oyster Bar, this most recent social experiment with national security represents one small step for the “progressive” agenda and one giant prance toward the pansification of the greatest military in world history. It’s a jaw-dropping “lack in good judgment.” In 1991 the late Gen. Robert H. Barrow, former commandant of the Marine Corps, gave compelling testimony on the subject before the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee. He stated, “If you want to make a combat unit ineffective, assign some women to it. … In three wars – World War II, Korea and Vietnam – I found no place for women to be down in the ground combat element,” he concluded. In a recent column headlined “Women in Ground Combat,” Bing West, former Marine officer and assistant secretary of defense under President Ronald Reagan, notes that, during his testimony, Gen. Barrow “cited the 1950 fighting retreat from the Chosin Reservoir in temperatures of minus 20 degrees, with one Marine division pitted against eight Chinese divisions. Had women comprised 15 percent of his division, Barrow concluded, the Marines would have lost the battle. ‘The very nature of women disqualifies them from doing it (killing so brutally),’ Barrow said. ‘Women give life, sustain life, nurture life; they don’t take it.’” Evidently, Gen. Barrow never met one of today’s abortion-worshiping feminist “Flukes” of nature. Still, they only kill innocent children who can’t fight back. In short, Gen. Barrow observed that opening the front lines to, um, “infantrywomen” would not only cost precious American lives, it would ultimately “destroy the Marine Corps.” Now, I know, who the heck do Barrow and West think they are, right? Did they ever bravely serve God and country as a glorified teacher’s assistant at Harvard Law? I think not. Did they ever do “a little blow,” march with the Black Panthers, “organize their communities” into welfare-dependent hellholes, or drink lattes with “Marxist professors and the structural feminists”? No. Sheesh. Even so, despite an obvious lack of credibility on combat readiness and a meager century or so in combined service, I think we should at least humor them a bit. “To Barrow, a warrior admired by three generations of grunts,” wrote West, “ground combat meant killing under the harshest of circumstances. Barrow opposed the incorporation of women into infantry units characterized by primal instincts: sleeping, defecating, eating, and smelling like wolf packs while hunting down and slaughtering male soldiers.” That’s the problem with political correctness – with liberalism in general. It raises a pseudo-utopian barrier to reality. Often times that barrier is deadly. This is what happens when a gaggle of left-wing civilian politicians who don’t know which end of the gun goes “bang!” are placed in charge of national security. These yahoos couldn’t bust a grape with a sledge hammer, let alone lift a sledge hammer. This is what happens when we allow “progressives” to deconstruct our culture by imposing, through public policy, the fantastical delusion of a “genderless society.” I fully support women learning self-defense and packing heat for protection. I’ve known a number of gals so tough that, for his own safety, a fellow would be better served to break it off via text message should the relationship go south. Still, as a former professional boxer and police officer, and having served 12 years in the armed services myself, I can say this without equivocation: While there may be the extremely rare anecdotal exception, in direct one-on-one military combat, the toughest, baddest, meanest chick out there is going to get stomped by the weakest infantryman. This is life and death stuff. Women are no more made for the front lines than men are made for childbearing. Don’t get me wrong – I love women. I’m married to a woman and am on the hook for two future weddings of future women who, admittedly, have me hopelessly wrapped around pink-polished little fingers. Even so, if I’m on the front lines and Ahmed, Abdul and Hakeem come charging with fixed bayonets, I danged sure want Billy Bob, not Barbara, in my foxhole. This doesn’t even scratch the surface. What of the sensitive dynamics of sex and jealousy? How about the reality that, despite feminist protestations to the contrary, chivalry is not dead? Men are naturally wired to protect the weaker sex, even if it runs counter to combat mission. Honorable men will drop everything to protect a woman, even if it means dying in the process. If the presence of women is not a factor, than neither is sex, jealousy or chivalry (putting aside the whole “gays in the military” debacle). More importantly, if women remain shielded from direct combat, lives are saved and battles are won. Add women, and you add weakness. Both lives and battles are lost. It’s felony stupid. Am I suggesting that the sitting president of the United States is stupid? Not exactly – not in terms of overall intelligence. But, as Momma Gump always said: “Stupid is as stupid does.” I’m sure that Mr. Obama has an average or slightly above average IQ. Still, objectively, measurably – as a point of fact supported by the overwhelming weight of the evidence – this man stupidly, perhaps even seditiously, insists upon circumventing Congress to shovel executive order after executive order atop the Mount St. Helens of dictatorial dung heaps. Eventually it has to blow. The question is no longer whether Barack Obama is weakening every noble aspect of American life, including our military. The question now becomes whether the rest of us will be able to put the pieces back together once this radical lefty is finally back in Hawaii for good – Mai Tai in one hand and leather-bound copy of the Communist Manifesto in the other. The question is whether America will survive Barack Obama.

The Growing Apathy Among Supporters of the GOP

"Ernie" has some thoughts on the growing apathy among the GOP.

    Like many of you my enthusiasm for the GOP has dwindled significantly.  In previous articles I've referred to them as the doormat wing of the democrat party, and I haven't seen any reason in the past few months to change my opinion.  Emotionally, I continually go from "fight-fight-fight to "who cares?"   I look around for new leaders to inspire republicans, but other than Rubio and Rand Paul, the pickens are pretty slim.  I've heard them both interviewed recently by the likes of Hannity, Limbaugh and Levin, and they both look and sound like the only ones capable of leading us out of the abyss.  But as what?  Libertarians, republicans TEA Party or something entirely new?   Personally I think the GOP is on life support.  And I didn't quit them, they quit me.  Since the media, liberals and Hollywood have totally demonized the TEA Party, I had the brilliant idea of changing the name from the TEA Party to the Heritage Party and naming Jim DeMint as the head of it.  But not all is well and good with former TEA Party supporters.   I have a friend who is blaming the GOP demise on the TEA Party for putting up a few "loser" candidates and subsequently losing those elections.  Well, all I've got to say to that is the core of the conservative movement is in the House, Senate and numerous governor's offices, and by virtue of the TEA Party. 

 

     Saving the liberties and freedoms we've always known is a monumental task, and very possibly an impossible one.  This president  who's insulting the tradition of the oval office is leading us down a fast track to economic ruin.  In the process he's destroying the free enterprise system, individual initiative and responsibility, the constitution and Christianity.  That's quite an agenda he's got laid out in front of him, but I'm convinced he's capable of achieving his goals.  On top of that I heard where the whites will be the minority race in just 20-25 years.  Jesse Shake-down Jackson and Al Charlatan proudly claim that when that happens there'll be no more white presidents nor whites dominating the House and Senate.  Couple that bit of good news with Emir Obama getting a 3rd term (and he will if he can gain control of the House in 2014) and that will for sure be the end of the constitution and all the freedoms and liberties that came with it.   I sadly predict that the United States will find itself in the same situation as the east bloc of Europe following WW2.  The country will be broke and only a few workers will fill vital jobs (at starvation wages) while everyone else will be left to live in filth, chaos and poverty.  That will open the door for foreign governments to swoop in, take control of all private business and take over control of the country.  Just like the Soviet Union did in Poland, Hungary and the rest of the east bloc.

 

     Now the question is at my age should I really care?  After all, the younger generation doesn't care about anything but having the latest version of a smart phone, legalized marijuana, and free contraceptives.  They have no idea what real freedom and liberty is...or was, and they don't really care.  Today is their "new norm".   But I care.  And not just for me but for my grandchildren, that's why I continue to fight the battle and send my little column to our blog site. 

Reevaluating America

There is so much political information circulating on the Internet, some true, some not.  This email by and unknown author should make all step back and take stock of this country and our attitudes. 1)   Only in America could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes – be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all. 2)  Only in America could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population is black 3)  Only in America could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes. 4)  Only in America can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash. 5)  Only in America would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens. 6)  Only in America could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists." 7)  Only in America could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote. 8)  Only in America could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company(Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes(Nike). 9)  Only in America could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money. 10)  Only in America could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event. 11)  Only in America can a man with no background, no qualifications and no experience ... and a complete failure at his job ... be reelected.

How Much of What Happened in Benghazi is Hillary Clinton's Fault?

"Ernie" has some thoughts on Hillary Clinton's testimoney before the Senate.

 

Well, shucks.  If I ever had any delusions about the Benghazi hearings bringing out the truth regarding the total incompetence of Hillary, Obama and the rest of the regime involved with Benghazi, my delusions were laid to rest today.  There was so much slobbering, sniveling, and good old fashioned butt kissing, I lost my breakfast.  You would have thought they were interviewing Angelina Jolie.  There were a few exceptions, namely Paul, McCain and a couple of others, but the way the idolizing and pampering went on forever, the exceptions didn't amount to much.   Let's face it, our doormat republicans are just no match for the democrat party's blatant, in-your-face lying.  I was unpleasantly surprised to hear all the Hillary accolades coming from Bob Corker, our TN senator. (He rode to victory on the TEA Party express in '10).  Please tell me what Hillary has done as Secretary of State that's so darned wonderful.  The Arab Spring was a disaster;  Israel has been hung out to dry;  Iran's going full speed ahead with the nuke program;  N. Korea is a "ship of fools";  the middle east is a smoldering pile of hot embers, we've got 4 murdered Americans in Benghazi...and on and on.  Yeah, she's sure done a great job.

In defense of our defenseless GOP, with only 5 minutes allotted for questions and for answers, the foremat excluded any possibility for anyone to get too heated and accusatory with their question.  And she could easily avoid answering the questions in her allotted time.  And as for her being directed to submit her answers in writing because of a lack of time....yeah, I'm waiting for that.

On disaster front #2, our GOP pseudo-leadership has kicked the debt reduction problem down the road for 4 months, in effect raising the debt limit for $400B.  You've got to hand it to Boehner, he caves so often he's got bats hanging from his belt.   He can cave even when there's no good reason to cave.  And McConnell?  Oh well, never mind. 

And last but not least, just before the exit door hit him in the rump, Leon Panetta removed the ban on women serving in front line combat zones.  Obviously our politicians are so old they don't remember there's a difference between men and women.  (Don't include Barney Frank in that analysis).  What happens if we get involved in a war and open up the draft again?  We going to draft young girls against their will and send them off to be killed or worse?  I think what we should do is send Hillary to the front lines in Afghanistan and tell her not to worry, the Taliban isn't trying to kill her because they don't like her, it's because of an American made anti-Muslim video they saw.

Yes sir, this was quite a day in DC.  Things are going to pieces in a hurry and our doormat republicans are standing there saying, "Huh?  Wha happened?"

 

Obama is Sinking America

By Matt Barber   Although it certainly wasn’t Oscar material, I still love the 1989 film “Erik the Viking,” starring, among others, Tim Robbins, Mickey Rooney, Eartha Kitt and John Cleese. It’s a campy British comedy-fantasy about a band of misfit Vikings on a quest to reach Valhalla. In one scene, the motley mob finds its way to the island of Hy-Brasil, a happy, peaceful, sunlit land populated by white-robed, free-loving, uber-pacifist morons. You know, liberals. Through a series of immaterial events, the island begins to sink into the ocean. As it does, Erik and crew evacuate and re-board the ship while Hy-Brasil’s inhabitants blithely remain, singing out of tune and playing harps, horns and other instruments badly. As the crest of the island dips beneath the sea, King Arnulf – a blundering buffoon played by Terry Jones of Monty Python fame – exclaims: “Everyone, stay calm. This is not happening.” It’d be funny if it weren’t true, but America has become Hy-Brasil, Barack Obama King Arnulf and liberals of every stripe his white-robed, mind-numbed, sycophantic subjects. Our enemies, both foreign and domestic – some of whom have “The Honorable” before their names – are laughing themselves silly. Indeed, “progressives” are a caricature of themselves, fully given over to pseudo-utopian, relativist ideals that remain ludicrous – hopelessly unattainable – by any objective standard. Still, our patchouli-wearing, pervert-pride-prancing, “pay-for-my-abortion”-shrieking friends are anything if not determined. They’ll let neither reality nor the U.S. Constitution stop them. Nothing, it seems – especially not those mealy-mouthed puddin’ pops running the GOP – can keep this ship of fools from sinking a once great nation. Problem is, they’re taking us all down with them. How do you stop skyrocketing debt and deficits that even liberal economists admit, if left unchecked, spell America’s doom? You don’t. You print trillions more and spend it like game tokens at Chuck E. Cheese. The party must go on or the kiddos get cranky. Sugar Daddy Barack’s got hungry mouths to feed. How do you stop evil nutjobs pumped full of psychotropic drugs from shooting-up “gun free zones”? Why, by leaving them heavily armed, of course. By unconstitutionally grabbing guns from the very law-abiding citizens positioned to tap two in the body and one in the head whenever these death-culture byproducts start killing. Liberal logic: “Up is down, down is up, we’ll make it so and we won’t give up!” In sum, you spend your way out of debt, tax your way to higher employment, fornicate your way disease-free, abort your way to non-violence and unilaterally disarm your way to national security. Any questions? Now, some of you may say, “But wait, Obama knows exactly what he’s doing. He’s no buffoon.” I both agree and disagree. Yes, the “progressive” dogma that courses through his veins – a mind-altering hallucinogen that gives liberals the munchies for power – is, indeed, inherently sinister. Still, he believes it with every ounce of his nicotine-shriveled heart. By deliberately deconstructing America’s constitutional republic – our free-market form of government – and replacing it with a Euro-socialist, moral relativist amalgam of his liking, this misguided anti-colonialist radical thinks – truly believes – that he’s doing the right thing. Such are the ways of the well-meaning tyrant. People sometimes ask me how it is that I manage to stay so optimistic – to maintain deep joy as we watch our nation’s foundations crumbling around us like the walls of Jericho. They wonder how it is that I’m able to pick up and carry on with a smile as America heads careening toward cliff’s edge. It’s easy. First, I put my full faith and trust in the Sovereign Creator of the universe who is the same yesterday today and forevermore: Christ, God incarnate, who is always faithful to those who have faith in Him. Then, I laugh at them; liberals, that is. I make fun of their dull-witted, self-defeating, abjectly wicked worldview. I follow God’s example. Of those who align themselves against His laws and His nature, Psalm 2:4 says, “He who sits in the heavens laughs. The Lord scoffs at them.” How can you not scoff at the silly twaddle they’re hocking? Ultimately, I’ve read the end of the book. I know what happens. The good guys win. That keeps me smiling no matter what goes down on the culture-war front. It keeps me snickering. Still, once I stop laughing, I get about the business of trying, with every fiber of my being, to defeat them. Not reason with them, not compromise with them, not suck up to them and certainly not trust them. Defeat them. Oh, I’ll love them. I must. I’m commanded to by the Lord I serve. I’ll pray for them, too. Do it all the time. But I’ll never, ever, under any circumstances, trust them. You may be surprised to learn that, in various forms, I get dozens – sometimes hundreds – of pieces of hate mail each week. My recent favorite came from a delightful bloke with the email handle synth84@aol.com. “Someday, someone may just choose to use their second amendment right (sic) to put a bullet in your worthless head. You are a disgusting waste of life you uneducated, non-human, uncivilized, evil, parasitic Nazi maggot. Shame on you.” Right. Shame on me. How do you reason with, compromise with, suck up to or trust that? You don’t. You defeat it. Abraham Lincoln, a man of deep faith, forecast nearly a century-and-a-half ago our current state of the union: “America will never be destroyed from the outside,” he said. “If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” President Obama sits atop the highest perch of a nation fast-sinking. “Everyone, stay calm. This is not happening,” he assures us. But it is happening. We’re destroying ourselves from within. We’re going down, and the only way to stop it is to utterly defeat those responsible. In the meantime, they sure are fun to laugh at.

What Should the Republicans do Now?

"Ernie" has some thoughts on what the Republicans should be doing.

Agenda for the republicans:  Now that the repubs brought the libs to their knees over Bush Tax Cut situation, it's time to start down the long list of things these relentless pitbulls can sink their teeth into for the next 4 years.

1.   The debt limit.  Some people think the repubs will kick the can down the road for another 90 days.  Can anyone honestly believe the GOP would do that?  Especially now that they have the libs shaking in their boots?

2.    Cost cutting.  (The other half of the tax cut situation).   Figures that came out this week show our deficit for 2012 was about $7T, not the $1.2T as advertised by Obama.   Unbelievably some people think the repubs will cave on this one, too.  King Obama must be sweating bullets wondering what the repubs (now known as the doormat wing of the dem party) must be planning to do to him if he doesn't reduce spending by a couple of trillion a year. 

3.     Stop the shipment to Egypt (at tax payer expense of course) of 20 F-16s and 200 Abrams tanks.  Everyone knows these will end up in the hands of people who want to destroy Israel.  Everyone, that is, except the Hussein Obama regime.  I'm sure when it's pointed out to Obama that Morsi is an Israeli hater and says all Jews are descends of pigs and apes, that he'll stop the delivery at once.

4.     Find out the truth about Fast & Furious once and for all.  Obama and Holder haven't got a chance hiding the truth from these bulldogs of justice much longer. 

5.     Find out the truth about Benghazi once and for all.  It's so blatantly obvious that the regime (especially Panetta, Hillary and Obama) is responsible for the death of 4 Americans that even the media may eventually have to admit it.  (Really?).   Not only are they responsible for the initial attack, but they've done absolutely nothing to retaliate for the cowardly act of murder.   Other then sending more money and weapons to the N.African Muslim terrorists of course.

6.     Put an end to Obama bypassing Congress and instead governing by Executive Order.  You just know the Rotwillers in the doormat wing of the Dem Party will nail him to the wall on this one.  After all, I'm willing to bet there's somebody on the GOP side of the aisle who's actually read the Constitution.  Well, maybe not, but at least someone who knows there is a Constitution.....somewhere. 

     I don't know about you, but I'm betting Obama's smelling "impeachment" in the air.  The pressure must be getting so great that he'll probably have to take another vacation.   I'll be our GOP leadership is grinning from ear-to-ear.  They just don't know why.  

Romney, the Reluctant Candidate

"Ernie" has some thoughts on Romeny's campaign.

I see where Tag Romney is saying his dad was a "reluctant" candidate for president this year.  Oh, really?  I thought the reason he didn't go after Obama and expose him for the anti-American, pro-Muslim, Marxist fraud he is, was because he was just a nice guy.  Well, you know what they say about nice guys.  I really believe his advisors convinced him that all he had to do was show his impressive business background and the independents would flock to him in droves.  After all we heard throughout his campaign that to win he had to get the independent vote.  Well, he did in 5 of 8 battleground states and he still lost.  Now we find out that he really didn't want to win all that much?  My question is....why in the heck then did he run?!   I have no doubts Santorum would have fought tooth and nail, but why rehash that story?  Because Mitt, if you didn't really want to win that badly why didn't you step back and let Santorum and Gingrich fight it out?
 

     According to Time Magazine, Obama won because he got the ignorant, the ill-informed and the "I don't give a darn" voters.  His political base, by the way,. (Not to exclude the usual assortment of far left loonies). 

 

     Now because we had the wrong candidate at the wrong time with the wrong strategy we've got ObamaCare, cliff-diving, a runaway EPA, more multi-million dollar vacations for the "royal family", a Muslim Brotherhood supporter/financier, and a president with an eye towards running for a third term.  People say, "Oh no, he can't do that.  The constitution prohibits it".  If he's successful in achieving his goal of destroying the Republican party, who's going to stop him?

     As for the "cliff-diving", the Emir's in a win/win situation.  If we don't go over the cliff it will be because the GOP caved to his every demand.  Then he can move on to other constitution-busting ideas.   If we do go over the cliff, he'll blame the whole thing on republicans.  Oh sure, everyone's taxes will go up, but he's gonna love that!  Then after a year of higher taxes, he'll capitulate to the wailing and gnashing of teeth by offering to reduce middle-class taxes back to 30-31%.  Not the 28% we have today, but below the higher tax rate of the Clinton era. You think any republican would vote against that?   Without question the state-run media will once again proclaim him the savior of the middle class.  With no republican party to stop him, the "3rd term amendment" will be scrapped. 

     We had a mandate after the 2010 elections, but the RNC and other establishment brass (RINOs) purposely destroyed the TEA Party and the conservative movement.  Can you believe (probably like many of you) I just got a letter from the RNC asking for contributions?  Are they out of their minds, or do they think I'm out of mine? 

UN-Palestine one-state "art" - still up at the UN

This article by Anne Bayefsky originally appeared on Breitbart.com.  The UN is now hosting in the public entrance hall of its New York headquarters a Palestinian exhibit which includes pieces that artfully depict all of Israel as Palestine. The display goes hand-in-hand with the logo featured at the top of the cover page of the speech that Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas' delivered to the General Assembly on November 29, 2012. That emblem continues to promote a one state solution, Palestine without Israel. On November 29th the General Assembly granted "Palestine" the status of "non-member observer state" under the pretense that the move brought the world closer to a two-state solution. But that same evening Palestinian UN representative Riyadh Mansour opened an exhibit entitled "Palestine -- Memories Dreams Perseverance." The political message is not subtle, with the works bearing titles such as "homeless," "delirious in exile," and "to Jerusalem we travel." The emblems of a long list of Palestinian terrorist organizations include the familiar shape in which Israel, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank are all combined into the only and only Palestine. Hamas emblem Palestinian Islamic Jihad Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command And here is the front page of the speech of Mahmoud Abbas' -- the "President of the State of Palestine": Here is a close-up of the logo on the cover page of Abbas' speech: It's a perfect fit with the message now embedded in the UN public exhibit. Here is "A Standing Prayer" by Manal Deeb. The exhibit also includes Deeb's "Memories of Trees" (a series with similar images): Whether "art" or "emblem" or the words of Abbas himself -- who told the General Assembly that the creation of Israel, the so-called "Al-Nakba of 1948," "was "one of the most dreadful campaigns of ethnic cleansing and dispossession in modern history" -- the Palestinian-UN agenda is hidden in plain sight.

Is America Sending Arms to Egypt?

"Ernie" has some thoughts on arms to Egypt.

 Our campaigner-in-chief has approved furnishing 20 new F-16s and 200 Abrams A1 tanks to the Muslim Brotherhood government of Egypt.  This puts Egypt at over 200 F16s and over 400 tanks.  And these aren't weapons taken out of our inventory.  Oh no, they're new planes and tanks paid for by American taxpayers.  This is an MB government run by the self appointed dictator Morsi who has stated publicly that he has no intention of honoring the Israli-Egyptian peace agreement of the 1970s, plus, he still commits to the Jihad goal of wiping Israel off the face of the Earth.  For his own people he's promising Sharia Law even tho the majority of his people don't want it.  With these arms shipments Morsi will have enough high-tech weaponry to attack....oh, let's see, who might that be?  Maybe....Israel?  Or how about his own people who might take up arms against him?   This is beginning to look a lot like Fast & Furious.

 

     Egypt already has the largest, most state-of-the-art weaponry of any Arab nation in the middle east, so why is Morsi building up his military at our expense?  Just who is he defending Egypt from?  Somalia?  Chad?  Libya?  Kenya?  Switzerland?  No, these weapons are not for Egypt's national defense.  Remember, most nations in Africa are run by the thug with the most weapons and is most willing to use them against his own people.  I think that includes Morsi.

     
     The Emir Obama has apparently ignored the implications of an Egypt run by the Muslim Brotherhood and...surprise!..putting Israel in harm's way.  He's thumbing his nose at Netanyahu yet once again.  You have to wonder, if war breaks out between the 2 countries who will our Islam loving president support?  He sure isn't going to go against the Muslim Brotherhood whom he's supported everywhere they've been on the move.  He continuously blames Israel for the Palestinian situation in spite of the constant rocket attacks by Hamas.  And let's not forget, this is the organization that spawned Hamas as well as al Qaeda.   (PS:  Can you explain to me why our Jews continue to support the Obama regime?)

 

     Is this the kind of foreign diplomacy that Obama accused Romney of not understanding?   He's weakening Israel by strengthening her enemies.   Meanwhile he's strengthening America's enemies by depleting our military and our treasury.  You think this is all by accident, or because he's incompetent?  Not on your life.  Obama knows what he's doing.  He's following his agenda of "transforming America".  Now I think more people are beginning to understand what he's transforming us to.

 

     The killings in Connecticut give him even more of an opportunity to weaken America by taking weapons away from our citizens.  "Never let a crisis go to waste", as Rohm Emanuel advised.  If he destroys the 2nd amendment then Latinos drug cartels, the Muslim Jihadists, and other like minded vermin can flood across our borders without having to worry about citizens fighting them off. 

 

     A final thought.  Isn't it amazing that our state run media avoids this story like the plague?  No not really.  They have the same goals as Herr Obama.

Radical Islam's Final Battle

 
   

We were sitting around the "liar's table" at the golf club the other morning watching a nice gentle rain come down.  We had already run off the only liberal in the crowd so things had settled down and taken on a serene, calm philosophical aura.  Naturally in such an angelic type atmoshere the topic turned to how the world would end.  (Seniors think about things like that).  You know, would it be war?  Meteors?  Jihad?  Interestingly, most of the guys (no women allowed in this non PC group) felt the end would be us against the Muslims.  Most likely the enemy would be Iran and all it's zombie satellite nations where wearing towels around your head is considered chic.  Everyone was in agreement that with the Marxist Muslim Messiah sitting in the WH, Iran would most certainly get nuclear weapons, distribute them to their terror groups and begin the "final battle" by destroying Israel.

     Not one to be labeled a "follower", I had a different take.  Just wondering what you might think about it.

 

     First:  If the radical Islamists will show a little patience they can take over all of the US without firing a shot.  Just look at what they're doing to Europe simply by immigration and multiplying like....well, like Muslims.  France and the UK already have enough Muslims to shape politics.  If unstopped, they'll soon have enough population to vote Muslims into leadership roles, throw out all non-Muslims, and  enact Shiriah Law as the law of the land.  France and England Muslim states?  Hey, that's how they've taken over middle east countries since Mohammad came to power.

 

     Second:  That worked so well in Europe and the Middle East, why not do it in the US?  It'll be easy sailing for them over here as long as we're in the process of being destroyed already by our Socialist Liberal Marxists, headed up by the Emir Obama.  Our libs keep cowering to their every demand (while trying to destroy Judaism, Catholicism and Christianity), plus we've already got a few Muslims in Congress (not to mention the White House), and numerous members of the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the Obama regime.

     No, I think the "final war" will not be between Iran and the US.   I think the final war will be between the Islam world and China.  Just think about it.  Can you see Islam moving into communist China and coming to power through immigration, conversion and massive population growth?  Remember, China limits families to how many kids they can have.  China isn't about to bow down to the radical Islamists.  If they (Muslims) try to take over China, the Chinese leadership would have no problem lining them all up against a wall and mowing them down.  I mean, even Shariah Law wouldn't protect them.

     One thing we can agree on.  The world's becoming a dangerous place, full of hate and violence.  And even more, an unbelievable potential for nuclear war at the ready.  And the people with their fingers on the buttons are morons such as N. Korea and Iran.  Let al Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbolah get their hands on the "big one" and they're so stupid they'd use it.  After all, they probably see their job as bringing on the 12the Imam by waging war on the west and Israel.    Peace is unsustainable.  Even the UN (you kidding?) can't protect us.